 |
 |
最佳投稿方式：
首先投頂級(jí)的會(huì)議，若被錄用，則對(duì)論文進(jìn)行擴(kuò)展，在題名上加“*”，說明：論文縮寫版已經(jīng)被某國(guó)際會(huì)議錄用，投國(guó)際期刊
這么做好處：1、讓編審注意，這篇論文已經(jīng)在國(guó)際會(huì)議上錄用，說明有價(jià)值，值得細(xì)看；
2、防止一稿多投。提前告訴
Your work has to be
(1)technically sound
(2)relevant
(3)original
(4)significant
起死回生（文章被拒之后)
期刊----（題目，摘要)---主編---》副編-聽取意見-》審稿人（reviewers)
會(huì)議-----主席--》副主席---》程序主席---》程序委員會(huì)（一般為審稿人)
如何處理返回意見（How to deal with handling Editors)
1.有禮貌 Be polite,but to the point
2.Ask for a change,if a clearly unfair case
把副主編換了，告訴主編，讓別的副主編來審稿，只要你有道理
如果有3個(gè)人審稿，2個(gè)人認(rèn)為不好，則不行。如果一個(gè)說好，一個(gè)說不好，對(duì)比，比較他們的意見
----Try every effort to address every concert
提供他們點(diǎn)對(duì)點(diǎn)的修改意見醫(yī).學(xué)全.在.線網(wǎng)站m.quanxiangyun.cn。
有的審稿者的意見不能從
Use other reviewers's comments to disagree with the regative ones
How to deal with "arregant" and "ignorant" reviewers
---if there is no chance to win them over,provide a gentle statement for the "unreasonable"criticisms that you are not addressing
---You should still try and resolve some of their comments
---your attitude towards the reviewers' comments is important
----all reviewers will read your statement of changes,and an accommodating approach is useful.
